I originally intended to begin this essay by asserting that the fifteen years following World War II were not a particularly good time to be an American. On further reflection, the statement remains valid, but I’d have to suggest a much extended time period — maybe three decades to around 1980. Looking back upon the post-World War II period, it seems as if the American Republic was suddenly beset with utter morons occupying high government positions when, in fact, they should not have been allowed to work at a car wash.
Following the Second World War, military veterans returned to their homes with the expectation of owning a piece of the good life everyone fought so hard for … that having the tragedies and heartbreaks of war, the inconveniences of rationing, and all the uncertainties behind you, that a new day was coming. It was dawn in America. Everyone could smell the Maxwell House Coffee — good to the last drop.
We drank the coffee but didn’t enjoy much of the good life. The American economy was in flux, but almost everyone expected that sort of thing. Politicians were telling Americans that we were somehow responsible for putting Europe back together, and yes — Americans would have to pay for it. Americans would have to pay for the U.S. arms race with the Soviet Union, too — after giving the Russians all of our military technology and secrets to the atomic bomb. Writer and former socialist George Orwell (real name, Eric Blair) called that period the “Cold War.” In Orwell’s context, the “cold war” was the threat of nuclear war. If Orwell was anything at all, he was perceptive.
None of the news was particularly good (for anyone). Almost everyone enjoyed the Cuban Missile Crisis — especially the kids who had to practice getting under their desks at school and the families that began borrowing money for a backyard bomb shelter. Iron curtains, bamboo curtains, and civil wars broke out from Indochina to Greece, Palestine to Iran, China, and Malaya. And then there was a period when it seemed as if every Jew who ever worked for the U.S. government was a spy for the Soviet Union — more than a handful, at any rate.
After John F. Kennedy was elected to the presidency in November 1960, one of his chief concerns was the loss of America’s prestige among world nations and the credibility of its government among the American people. He was determined to “draw a line in the sand.” There would be no more stalemates in the containment of global communism. In a comment made to journalist James Reston of the New York Times, Kennedy said, “Now, we have had a problem making our power credible; Vietnam looks like the place.”
Vietnam was not the place.
After taking office in January 1961, Kennedy was correct to acknowledge a failure in American diplomacy, but he might have given some consideration to the government’s inability to reason. Given the United States’ long history in Cuba, one wonders what Eisenhower thought when he authorized the CIA to plan a paramilitary invasion there. Even if it was true that just the mention of Fidel Castro’s name gave Eisenhower gas, what did the United States hope to gain by funding, organizing, and then screwing up an ex-pat invasion of Cuba?
It wasn’t just Eisenhower, his predecessor, or even Kennedy — the deficiency was in the entire body of American policy-makers whose collective brains couldn’t charge a triple-A battery. The cost of this deficiency was five million in Korea and Vietnam, and only the Almighty knows how many dead we’ve left behind in the Middle East. Yes, the madness continues —
If one could go back in time and sit with and engage one of the long-dead presidents in conversation, who would that be, and what would one wish to talk about? There are several presidents that I’d like to speak with. I might ask Roosevelt, for example, what he thought when he ordered the OSS to create and arm communist guerrillas in Southeast Asia? I might ask Truman, “What did you think North Korea and the Soviet Union would do after your Secretary of State neglected to include the Korean Peninsula under the umbrella of the United Nation’s defense pact? I would ask Mr. Eisenhower, given his background as a five-star general, “What was the likely result of invading Cuba with a mere 1,400 irregular Cuban exiles?” In other words, “What in the hell were you guys thinking?”
Fidel Alejandro Castro-Ruz was born into wealth. His father was a successful farmer from Galicia, Spain and his mother was the child of a Spanish Canarian. Fidel Castro was well-educated but an unruly child (typical of the way Hispanic boys are raised). He turned out just as his parents wished. Fidel began law studies at the University of Havana in 1945, which became the birthplace of his political activism. When he failed in his candidacy for class president, he became critical of corrupt politics — defined as anyone who disagreed with Fidel Castrol. It was an attitude quickly and easily transferred to real Cuban politics.
In college, Castro adopted the political philosophy of Eduardo Chibás, advocating for social justice, honest government, and political freedom. Ultimately, however — even while still in college — Fidel Castro became a man just like those he claimed to detest. He hired gangsters to suppress anyone whose views differed from his own, which was problematic because, according to historian John Gaddis, Fidel Castro was a revolutionary without an ideology. He was a street fighter, guerrilla, assassin, interminable speaker — and a pretty good baseball player, but Castro had only one focus: his lust for power. Fidel Castro was willing to use any means to obtain it. If he followed any example, it was that of Joseph Stalin — not Karl Marx.
Until 1898, Cuba was part of the Spanish Empire. In the preceding thirty years, Cuba was a troubled land with three wars of liberation, which began in 1868. Liberation finally came to Cuba through the Spanish-American War, but the United States withheld self-rule until 1902 when a Cuban-born American named Tomás Estrada Palma became Cuba’s first president. Afterward, large numbers of American settlers and businessmen began arriving in Cuba. Within three years, non-Cuban Americans owned sixty percent of Cuba’s rural properties. Palma’s growing unpopularity over these conditions prompted the US government to dispatch 5,000 Marines to “police” the island between 1906-1909. Marines returned for the same purpose in 1912, 1917, and 1921.
In 1952, Cuban general Fulgencio Batista seized power and proclaimed himself president. After consolidating his power, Batista canceled planned elections and introduced a new form of democracy to the Cuban people. He called it “disciplined democracy.” Until the appearance of Fidel Castro, the US Ambassador to Cuba was the second-most popular (the second most powerful) man in Cuba.
Batista’s tyranny resulted in an armed rebellion with several groups competing for domination. College professor Rafael G. Barcena headed the National Revolutionary Movement, University Student President Antonio Echevarria led the Revolutionary Student Union, and Fidel Castro led the 26 July Movement (M-26-7). Castro also led his guerrilla army against the Batistas from 1956 to 1959. The more Batista tried to repress Castro, the less popular he became. By mid-1958, when his army was in full retreat, Batista resigned the presidency in December and went into exile. Before he departed Cuba, Batista liberated $ 300 million US dollars. One can live comfortably in Malaga, Spain, on that money.
Cuban attorney Manuel Urrutia Lleo replaced Batista as president. Castro approved of Lleo, particularly since most of Manuel’s cabinet were members of M-26-7. Lleo appointed Castro to serve as prime minister. Dismissing the need for new elections, Castro proclaimed the new administration a “direct democracy,” in which the Cuban people would assemble en masse and express their democratic will.
Yet, despite Castro’s political success and relative popularity, not every Cuban was happy — so the revolution continued for several years. It’s how Latino politics is done. The Escambray Rebellion (which lasted for six years) had the support of Cuban exiles, the American CIA, and Rafael Trujillo’s regime in the Dominican Republic. As rebellions go, it was a bloody mess. There were explosions, arsons, assassinations, firefights in downtown areas, and a few melees in outlying areas. A few revolutionaries even hijacked an airline and ordered it flown to Jacksonville, Florida. By May 1961, Castro decided he’d had enough “revolution” and started getting serious about cracking down on all political opposition. Castro-friendly police officials began arresting hundreds of the usual suspects.
In public, Castro objected to the torture and torment Batista inflicted on the Cuban people, but Castrol increased the amount of suffering forced on Cuban dissidents. Reacting to stories of widespread prison torture and assassination, Cubans demanded fair trials for those accused of crimes. At first, Castro appeared as a moderating force and helped set up public trials, but a responsible American press openly challenged Castro’s claims, accusing those efforts of a sham. They reported that Castro’s “fair trials” always ended with execution. The American press was right about Castro. Behind the scenes, press members daring to criticize Castro for any alleged atrocities found themselves at odds with media union members. In 1960, a government edict mandated that every news article criticizing government policy contain a “clarification” by a printer’s union representative attesting to the truth of the article. It was the beginning of government censorship in Cuba.
Castro’s reaction to allegations in the press was vociferous. “Revolutionary justice,” he said, “is not based on legal precepts but moral conviction.” As a demonstration of his support for revolutionary justice, Castrol organized the first Havana trial in front of an audience of 17,000 onlookers. When a revolutionary jury found a group of former Cuban pilots “not guilty” of intentionally bombing a Cuban village, Castro ordered a retrial. At the second trial, the jury found all of the accused “guilty as charged.” Revolutionary justice also saw the execution of former Castro ally William A. Morgan.
In 1960, the U.S. government wasn’t happy with the direction of Castro’s government.
In 1960, the US and Cuba entered into a period of quid-pro-quo diplomacy. Castro ordered the country’s oil refineries (then controlled by Exxon, Standard Oil, and Shell) to process crude oil purchased from the Soviet Union. The US government ordered the companies to refuse. Castro then nationalized the refineries. The US canceled all sugar imports from Cuba. Castro responded by nationalizing all US banks, sugar mills, and other holdings. The US imposed an embargo on all American-made exports (except medicines and certain foods). Castro seized over 500 American-owned businesses, including Coca-Cola and Sears Roebuck.
At a meeting of the Organization of American States (OAS), the US Secretary of the State accused Castro of being a Bolshevik, a Stalinist, and a tool for global communism. Secretary Christian Herter urged the OAS to denounce the Castro regime. Castro pointed to the plight of American blacks, suggesting that the United States might consider getting its own house in order before criticizing others. At the meeting, the US pledged not to interfere in the domestic affairs of the Cuban government — but, of course, the pledge was a major fib because, by the time of the OAS meeting, the American CIA was already passing around its catalog of dirty tricks for comments and recommendations.
The idea of overthrowing the Castro regime took root early in 1960. As the threat of global communism grew larger, the CIA increased its effort to undermine communist countries, organizations, and activities — even if that meant supporting brutal neo-fascist dictatorships.
Heading this effort was CIA Director Allen Dulles, a former member of the OSS. Recognizing that the Castro regime was becoming openly hostile toward the US, Dulles urged President Eisenhower to authorize a para-military invasion of the island. Eisenhower wasn’t convinced an attack was a good idea, but based on developing options, the president permitted Dulles to “begin planning.” Richard M. Bissell, Jr., one of the “Georgetown set” insiders, was in charge of this effort.
On 17 March 1960, the CIA submitted its plan to overthrow Fidel Castro to the National Security Staff. President Eisenhower suggested that he might be able to support it, and then he approved $13 million to explore further options. The plan’s first objective was to replace Castro with someone more devoted to the interests of the Cuban people and the United States — and of course, in a manner that would not implicate the United States.
In August 1960, the CIA contacted the Cosa Nostra mob in Chicago, offering them a contract to assassinate Fidel Castro, his brother Raul, and Revolutionary Che Guevara. If the mob’s operation should prove successful, the CIA promised to reward them with a monopoly on gaming, prostitution, and drugs inside Cuba. [Morality is only an 8-letter word].
After this 1960 CIA-Mob meeting, planning for Fidel Castrol’s assassination began in earnest. Some of the CIA and Chicago mob’s methods were creative in the same way as James Bond’s awesome gadgets: poison pills, exploding seashells, and clothing coated with toxins. The CIA also considered the usual methods of murder: snipers, ambuscades, and explosives. No Aston Martin was ever mentioned. Later, in 1961, when President Kennedy was making secret overtures to Castro, CIA officer Desmond Fitzgerald assigned CIA agent Rolando Cubela to murder Castro. Fitzgerald told Cubela that Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy had sanctioned the kill.
Bissell assembled agents to help him put the plan together, several of whom had participated in the coup d’état in Guatemala in 1954 — including David Philips, Gerry Droller, G. Gordon Liddy, and E. Howard Hunt. Droller was placed in charge of rounding up anti-Castro Cuban ex-pats living in the United States. Hunt helped fashion a government in exile (which the CIA would control) and then traveled to Havana to meet with people from various backgrounds. When Hunt returned to the United States, the State Department denied the CIA’s request to conduct irregular military training on U. S. soil. Cuban exiles were afterward informed that they would have to travel to Mexico for their training.
The plan involved four elements: propaganda, covert operations inside Cuba, assembling paramilitary forces outside of Cuba, and providing naval gunfire, air, and logistical support for the ground forces once the invasion occurred. At this point, however, it was only a planning session. Contrary to what many people now claim, there is no evidence that Eisenhower ever approved a final plan or gave his final approval for “launch.”
On 20 October 1960, presidential candidate John Kennedy released a scathing criticism of Eisenhower’s Cuba policy which stated, in part, “We must attempt to strengthen the non-Batista democratic anti-Castro forces … who offer eventual hope of overthrowing Castro.” At this point, Castro must have had a good inkling about U. S. intentions toward Cuba.
By 31 October, in addition to John Kennedy’s “heads up” to Castro, the CIA had already experienced several “war stoppers.” In fact, it almost couldn’t get any worse. The Cubans intercepted every attempt to infiltrate covert agents, and the CIA’s aerial supply drops all fell into the hands of the Cuban military. Fidel Castro would have had to have been the deaf, dumb, and blind kid not to suspect something “big” was about to happen. Bissell began to re-think his game plan. His best new idea was an amphibious assault involving some 1,500 men. Note to clarify: that would be fifteen-hundred lightly armed men opposing around 89,000 well-armed home guards.
John Kennedy’s election in early November 1960 re-energized CIA operatives. Dulles and Bissell provided a general outline of their plan to president-elect Kennedy on 18 November 1960. Dulles voiced confidence that the CIA was capable of overthrowing the Cuban government. On 29 November 1960, President Eisenhower met with the Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, Treasury Department, and CIA to discuss Bissell’s amphibious raid idea. No one expressed any objection, and Eisenhower gave his tentative approval subject to the preferences and prerogatives of president-Elect Kennedy.
Bissell presented his outline to the CIA’s “special group” on 8 December 1960. Of course, he would not commit any details to written records because if there was ever a time for “plausible deniability,” this operation was it. The planning continued until 4 January 1961. Bissell added a “lodgment” of about 750 men at an undisclosed location in Cuba.
Following the election of 1960, President Eisenhower conducted two meetings with president-elect Kennedy at the White House. Eisenhower informed Kennedy that since the previous March, the CIA had managed to train several small units of Cuban ex-pats in Guatemala, Panama, and Florida, but it was nothing of significant consequence. President Eisenhower emphasized that despite the Cuban ex-pats’ stated preferences, he was not in favor of returning Batista to power at the head of an American-funded foreign militia.
On 28 January 1961, CIA officials briefed President Kennedy together with key members of his cabinet. The plan was code-named Operation Pluto, which called for a 1,000-man amphibious landing at Trinidad, Cuba, 170 miles southeast of Havana, near the foothills of the Escambray Mountains. Secretary of State Dean Rusk offered a few embarrassing observations. He didn’t understand, for example, why the CIA was talking about airfields and B-26 aircraft. If this was a covert operation if the United States intended to blame everything on Cuban ex-pats, where would such men come up with the B-26 Marauder? Kennedy wasn’t pleased with Trinidad; he wanted a less likely landing site. After the meeting, the unenthusiastic new president authorized planning to continue but directed additional briefings with progress.
In March, CIA officers helped Cuban exiles in Miami create the Cuban Revolutionary Council. The CIA ensured that the Revolutionary Council approved former Cuban prime minister José Miró Cardona as Cuba’s new head of state.
CIA planners divided its fifteen-hundred-man paramilitary force into six battalions (five infantry and one paratroop). According to the plan, these men would assemble in Guatemala on 17 April and launch their assault from that location.
Despite the deep reservations of Secretary Rusk and U.S. Army General Lyman Lemnitzer, JCS Chairman, President Kennedy approved the CIA’s plan, now known as Operation Zapata, on 4 April 1961. The Bahía de Cochinos (Bay of Pigs) in Las Villas Province was chosen as the point of assault because it was relatively isolated and had a sufficiently long airfield. Also, its location would make it easier for the United States to deny direct involvement. Bissell designated three landing sites (Blue Beach, Red Beach, and Green Beach).
On 15 April, eight CIA-owned B-26 bombers attacked Cuban airfields and returned to their South Florida base. On 17 April, the main invasion force landed at Blue Beach and quickly overwhelmed a local militia.
Initially, José Ramon Fernandez led the Cuban army’s counter-attack. Later, Fidel Castro took control of the Cuban force. The Cubans quickly publicized the event as a U. S. invasion. For whatever reason, the invaders lost their initiative and faltered in the face of Castro’s overwhelming response. Back in Washington, President Kennedy chickened out and withheld the CIA’s promised naval and air support, without which the CIA plan could not — and did not succeed.
The Cuban exiles surrendered to Castro’s forces on 20 April. More than an overwhelming defeat for the Cuban invaders, it was an unmitigated disaster for American foreign policy and CIA whizbangmanship — even worse than that, the invasion elevated Fidel Castro to the position of a national hero, solidified his place in Cuba, and pushed Cuba toward closer ties with the Soviet Union. The stage was thus set for the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962.
In the history of American clandestine operations, there may not have been a less covert operation than the Bay of Pigs invasion. To begin with, all the Cubans had to do to achieve a forewarning of the invasion was read the American newspapers. The Cuban invaders themselves openly bragged about what they were up to throughout the entire training period. Loose lips sink ships.
In addition to this lack of security, the CIA’s covert operators initiated several acts of sabotage before the landing, such as setting fire to government buildings and department stores, a robust propaganda effort, and of course, Castro was receiving regular reports on the CIA’s activities, courtesy of his new best friends, the Soviet KGB. Everyone who was anyone knew all about the CIA’s top-secret Cuban invasion plan.
Despite all the Navy’s efforts to mask their role in support of the invading force, Cuban-flown Soviet MiG-15’s kept regular tabs on the position of naval support platforms beginning on 14 April 1961. More than this, the Cuban aircraft wanted the navy to know that the Cuban air force was keeping an eye on them. A planned diversionary amphibious assault on the night of 14/15 April turned back mid-way to shore when Cuban defense forces opened fire. Later that morning, the CIA dispatched a T-33 reconnaissance sortie over the diversionary site, which the Cuban defense force promptly shot down. The plane crashed into the sea, and its pilot, Orestes Acosta, did not survive.
Also, on 15 April, eight B-26 aircraft with Cuban air force markings attacked three Cuban airbases (two near Havana and one close to Santiago). The strike intended to cripple the Cuban air force, and while a few Cuban military aircraft were destroyed, most casualties were civilian airframes. However, this was not the story told to CIA handlers by the pilots during their post-mission debrief. The CIA didn’t know the truth of these strikes until after reviewing aerial films taken by a U-2 overflight on 16 April. It was based on this U-2 film and President Kennedy’s intention to continue his (worst-ever) deception that he canceled all future air support missions.
At mid-day on 15 April, Cuba’s UN ambassador began screaming bloody murder about a U. S. invasion of his country. Much earlier in the year, CIA operatives approached Cuba’s UN ambassador, Señor Raúl Roa, attempting to encourage his defection. It was an effort, Roa, no doubt reported to this foreign minister — and this would have been another piece in the puzzle for the Castro government.
Responding to Roa’s accusations, America’s UN ambassador, Adlai Stevenson, denied US involvement in the reported incident. President Kennedy’s statement to the press was, “I have emphasized before that this was a struggle of Cuban patriots against a Cuban dictator. While we could not be expected to hide our sympathies, we made it repeatedly clear that the armed forces of this country would not intervene in any way.”
Castro’s government knew better. Before the end of the day on 15 April, the head of Cuba’s National Police, Efigenio Amerijeiras, began rounding up all the usual suspects. The National Police would eventually arrest upwards of 100,000 Cuban citizens. They would become the hapless casualties in the CIA’s war against Fidel Castro. In all likelihood, probably no more than a handful of Cubans living in Cuba at the time had any knowledge of the invasion.
Bissell’s numerous assistants included Tracey Barnes, Allen Dulles, a training cadre from the U. S. Army Special Forces Group, members of the U. S. Air Force and Air National Guard, and CIA officers David Atlee Philips, E. Howard Hunt, David Morales, Gary Droller, Jacob Esterline, Colonel Jack Hawkins, Colonel Stanley Beerli, and Felix Rodriguez.
According to Allen Dulles, CIA planners always believed that once the invasion force went ashore, President Kennedy would authorize any action required to prevent mission failure (which is what Eisenhower did in 1954 in Guatemala). Kennedy would not pursue that path, but the mission’s failure depressed the president and, in fits of anger, indicated to a confidante that he wanted to splinter the CIA “into a thousand pieces.”
After Kennedy’s assassination, investigators considered (very briefly) whether the threat might have been connected to his untimely death. Splintering the CIA did not occur, but from that moment forward, Kennedy had little confidence in the advice of the CIA or senior officers inside the Pentagon. According to Kennedy’s friend Ben Bradlee, the president told him, “The first advice I’m going to give my successor is to watch the generals and to avoid feeling that because they were military men, their opinions on military matters were worth a damn.”
The Kennedy administration didn’t mind playing fast and loose with international law or ignoring gentlemanly behavior, but it was mightily embarrassed when the secret invasion plan turned into a well-publicized failure. During a State Department press conference on 21 April, John Kennedy issued his often quoted statement, “There’s an old saying that victory has a hundred fathers — and defeat is an orphan.” He then accepted responsibility for the shenanigans, even though Secretary Adlai Stevenson denied involvement with the United Nations. A few months later, revolutionary and mass murderer Che Guevara sent a note to President Kennedy thanking him for the invasion, saying, “Before the invasion, the revolution [in Cuba] was weak. Now it’s stronger than ever.”
Subsequently, the Castro regime became (understandably) paranoid about US intentions, particularly after Kennedy imposed trade sanctions, which he followed with a formal embargo. The invasion didn’t work out, but that didn’t stop Kennedy from doubling his efforts to depose Fidel Castro. A short time later, Kennedy ordered the Pentagon to design a secret plan to overthrow Castro. The plan, codenamed Operation Mongoose, included sabotage and assassination.
- Ambrose, S. E. Eisenhower: Soldier and President. American Biography Press, 2007.
- Anderson, J. L. Che Guevara: A Revolutionary Life. Grove/Atlantic Press, 1997.
- Bathell, L. Cuba. Cambridge University Press, 1993.
- Bohning, D. The Castro Obsession: U.S. Covert Operations Against Cuba, 1959-1965. Potomac Books, 2005.
- Lynch, G. L. Decision for Disaster: Betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. Brassy Publishing, 1998.
- Schlesinger, A. M. Jr., A Thousand Days: John F. Kennedy in the White House. Houghton-Mifflin, 1965, 2002.
 Disciplined democracy is somewhat like compassionate conservatism. It may be disciplined, but it isn’t democracy, and it might be compassionate, but it isn’t conservatism.
 Morgan (1928 – 1961) was a U.S. citizen who fought in the Cuban Revolution as a commandante instrumental in helping Castro’s forces achieve victory. Morgan was one of about two dozen U.S. citizens to fight in the revolution and one of only three foreign nationals to hold high rank. Following the revolution, Morgan became disenchanted with Castro’s turn to communism. When Castro discovered that Morgan was one of the CIA operatives in the Escambray rebellion, Cuban authorities arrested, tried, and executed him in the presence of Fidel and Raul Castro.
 Including a number of former OSS officers, George Kennan, Dean Acheson, Desmond Fitzgerald, Clark Clifford, Eugene Rostow, Cord Meyer, William Averell Harriman, Felix Frankfurter, James Reston, Allen Dulles, and Paul Nitze.
 If verifiably true, then there is a justifiable reason to corollate the relationship between the CIA and the plot to assassinate South Vietnam’s President Ngo Dinh Diem (2 Nov 1963) and the CIA, American mafia, and the assassination of President John F. Kennedy on 22 Nov 1963.
 The American people never knew about this, of course, until the Church Committee Hearings in 1975. The Church Committee investigated CIA abuses, such as the assassination of foreign leaders. Since most of these were never proven beyond a reasonable doubt, the committee labeled them “Alleged Assassination Plots.”
 Later, Liddy and Hunt were both convicted of illegal activity involving the White House Plumbers.
 Both Kennedy brothers appeared enthusiastic about the operation, and both seemed to play down any hesitation from cabinet advisors. They had made a campaign promise to rid Cuba of Castro, and that’s what they intended to do.
 It was later learned that the CIA knew that the KGB knew about the invasion plan and that the KGB had likely informed Castro, but it was something the CIA never shared with President Kennedy. The CIA was also informed by British Intelligence that, according to their sources, the Cuban population was overwhelmingly behind Fidel Castro. There would likely be no groundswell of support for the ex-pat invaders.
 Colonel Hawkins, a Marine Corps Officer, was assigned to the CIA to assist in planning for amphibious operations. After completing basic officer’s school in 1939, Hawkins served with the 4th Marines in Shanghai, China, and later moved with that regiment to the Philippine Islands. Captured on Bataan, the Japanese interned him at a POW camp on Mindanao. He and several others escaped, eventually making their way to Colonel Wendell Fertig’s guerrilla band. Hawkins led several guerrilla raids against the Japanese until evacuated by submarine to Australia. He later authored a book about his Philippine experiences, titled Never Say Die.
 Quick review: a new president who wants to split his spy agency into a thousand pieces could become a primary target for assassination. If the CIA had a hand in the assassination of John F. Kennedy, it was very likely the only project they undertook in the 1960s that worked out as planned.
 An extensive campaign of terrorist attacks against Cuban (civilian) government officials, led by Edward Lansdale and William K. Harvey.
10 thoughts on “The Bay of Pigs”
Reblogged this on Calculus of Decay .
Thank you, sir.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very enlightening and of course believable.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This stuff makes you wonder about the kind of people inside the beltway making decisions for the rest of us. Gad … the idiocy is damn near unbelievable. Thanks for stopping by, Kid.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The definition of Cluster. So hard to make something better, but so damn easy to Fubar it.
Merle Miller: Mr. President, I know that you were responsible as President for setting up the CIA. How do you feel about it now?
Truman: I think it was a mistake. And if I’d know what was going to happen, I never would have done it.
Give any organization tons of money and no oversight or accountability and you create a monster.
Unfortunately, we are seeing that in the war-stressed Navy Seals as well, whose well-won cloak of glory and admiration has been an extra layer of protection that ultimately allowed some malignancies to grow within that great and noble organization. I pray the Seals can clean it up and get some oversight, because we need such organizations. The CIA and FBI need to be abolished.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re right, of course. The bane of humankind is human nature. Truman was always in a rush to do everything right this minute. He didn’t trust his generals as far as he could throw ‘em, and he certainly didn’t like the OSS — something he shared in common with MacArthur, but he was a bit too quick to dismantle it, which left him dependent on his WW II generals to replace OSS with something else. Turned into a goat rope, IMO. Nothing’s changed, either. Thanks for weighing in, Kurt.
Both Truman and Eisenhower were talented men, who often depended on the wrong advisors, only changing their minds when it became apparent that their advisors had their own interests before those of the nation as a whole. I have done some digging in the past, and I truly believe that it was not necessary to drop the two atomic bombs on Japan. That our casualties would not have been much different, and we would still have seen Japan surrender in a very similar time frame. But Truman’s advisors pushed him into a corner, to show the world that we had such powerful weapons, as a deterrent in the future.
Eisenhower, in his farewell address, warned us about the great danger of feeding our military industrial complex, and how it would lead to war becoming not only tolerable, but a favorite pastime of the leadership. What a prescient outlook he had. I actually have visited his gravesite, in Abilene, KS. His coffin is under a huge marble slab, and the room it is in is eerily silent, with no need for any sign asking for people to remain that way, out of respect. It is just automatic, that when you step inside, you have a feeling as if you are in the presence of someone who made a very huge contribution to all of mankind or something.
There are certainly other places like that, where you are moved to stunned silence. The tomb of the unknown soldier seems like it would be one such place. We have been blessed as Americans to have had so very many soldiers, brave and often times, scared out of their wits, but still brave and resolved, to give their lives, that the rest of us might live free. Now that Veteran’s Day is fast approaching, I can only thank anyone who happens upon this comment, that is a veteran. I wish that I could offer more than a thank you, but it comes with a part of my heart, and my prayers for your strength and continued courage as your days go by. May God bless you and your loved ones, now and forever, for you are all heroes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for this excellent comment. It is very thoughtful and warm. None of us were standing in the room when Mr. Truman made his fateful decision. MacArthur was outraged by its use, or he at least later stated as much. By the time of that decision — so much money had been expended on the project it may have been impossible for Truman to set that monster aside. But in that time, there was so much hatred for the “Jap” that such emotions may have been too strong to resist.
I greatly admired Eisenhower for keeping us out of Southeast Asia (at least, our men), but Ike was a man and infallible. Once more, the urgings of his intelligence staff may have led him down a primrose path. In my view (many years after the fact, of course), it was utter stupidity to commit so many assets to “take out” one windbag.
The military/industrial complex remains a problem. We have too many people like Liz Cheney who have never seen a war they didn’t like. As a result, we keep sending our precious young men into harm’s way, and when they return home again, wounded physically and mentally, that same cabal turns its back on them and even conspires against them.
I have not been to President Eisenhower’s grave site — but I have been to Gettysburg and stood on the fateful ground and felt the presence of those men; I have been to the Alamo and sensed the company of their spirits. At Mount Vernon, I was stunned into silence.
Thank you again for your comment. I hope you’ll return.