One significance of Methuen, Massachusetts (settled in 1642) is that it served as one of the first American portals for Scots-Irish immigrants. Today, approximately nine million Americans claim Scots-Irish descendancy. One of these American-born Scots-Irishmen was the son of James and Mary Rogers, whom they named Robert, born on 8 November 1731. Eight years later, in 1739, the Rogers family relocated to the Great Meadows district of New Hampshire. Robert was fifteen years old when he joined the New Hampshire militia during King George’s War (1744-1748).
What made European wars so very complex during the early modern period (1453-1789) was that (a) they were mired in complex rules of noble succession, (b) several of the major royal houses were related to one another through marriage, and (c) the continual (and often confusing) secret alliances that existed between them. So, before continuing, let’s sort out the War of Austrian Succession (1740-1748).
The War of the Austrian Succession was a conglomeration of several conflicts, two of which developed after the death of Charles VI, head of the Austrian Hapsburgs and Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire. Upon his death in 1740, Charles VI had no male heirs. Since there were proscriptions against a woman becoming heir to specific European thrones (notably, the Holy Roman Empire), Charles VI’s daughter Maria Theresa was determined to defend her right of inheritance. A separate issue was that the Hapsburgs had retained the Crown of Holy Roman Emperor since 1437. This was an elective position, not subject to the right of inheritance. The European ruling houses decided that it was time to end Hapsburg’s Holy Roman dynasty.
The participants in the War of Austrian Succession included Austria, Bavaria-Saxony, the Dutch Republic, France, Hanover, Prussia, Savoy, Spain, Poland, Italy, Sardinia, and Great Britain. Its significance was that it reshaped the balance of power in Europe, established a precedent for subsequent wars of succession, and because it obligated the involvement of alliance partners into affairs that ordinarily would be none of their concern. British involvement came from its alliance with Austria, which opened the door to additional conflicts with France and Spain, who were allied against Austria and needed minimal prompting to war against the British — their North American competitor.
The War of Austrian Succession, as it evolved in British America, became King George’s War (1744-1748), the third of four “French and Indian Wars” fought in North America. King George’s War was also a continuation of the War of Jenkins’ Ear fought between Britain, Spain, and Spain’s ally, France.
Following the tradition of the “common burden,” Robert Rogers enlisted as a private in Captain Daniel Ladd’s Scouting Company of the New Hampshire Militia in 1746. In the following year, he joined the Scouting Company of Captain Ebenezer Eastman. In both assignments, Robert Rogers joined the effort of the local militia in guarding the New Hampshire frontier against French and Indian raids. The strategy of these ranging companies was to “hit them before they could hit you.”
In 1753, Virginia’s lieutenant governor, Robert Dinwiddie, commissioned the half-brother of Lawrence Washington, the Adjutant-General of Virginia, a young man named George, as a Major of the Virginia militia and appointed him to command one of the colony’s four militia districts. At the time, the British competed with France to control the Ohio Valley. Initially, the effort involved the construction of British and French fortifications along the Ohio River. Dinwiddie dispatched Major Washington on a three-mission expedition into the Ohio Valley. Washington’s orders were to demand the withdrawal of French forces from Virginia land, establish peace with the Iroquois Confederacy, and gather intelligence about the disposition of French military forces.
In November, Major Washington’s force reached the Ohio River but was soon intercepted by a French patrol and escorted to Fort Le Boeuf. The officer commanding Fort Le Boeuf was Commandeur Jacques Legardeur de Saint-Pierre (1701-1755), who welcomed Major Washington by rendering him every courtesy of his rank and position. Washington dutifully informed Saint-Pierre that it was his duty to insist that the French vacate Virginia colony land. A few days later, after providing Washington and his men with food stores and extra winter clothing, Sant-Pierre handed his reply to Gov. Dinwiddie in a sealed envelope and sent George and his men on his way back to Williamsburg.
In February 1754, Dinwiddie advanced Washington to lieutenant colonel and appointed him as second-in-command of the Virginia Regiment of militia, a force of around 300 men. His new orders were to take half the regiment and confront French forces at the Forks of Ohio (the convergence of the Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers). Washington’s expedition set off in April, eventually learning that those French forces included around 1,000 men engaged in the construction of Fort Duquesne. Washington established a defensive position at Great Meadows, seven miles from the French construction site.
With the understanding that the French force involved around 1,000 men, Washington enlisted the aid of Indian allies (presumably Iroquois) and moved to attack the French garrison, which consisted of around fifty men. The confrontation became known as the Battle of Jumonville Glen, during which Washington’s force killed all French defenders, including its commandant, Joseph Coulon de Jumonville. When French officials learned what had happened, they accused Washington of making an unprovoked attack, which would only be true if the French were not encamped on British territorial grounds. The Battle of Jumonville ignited the (fourth) French and Indian War (1754-1763).
The French and Indian War (1754-1763)
War with France engulfed the British colonies in 1755, also spreading to Europe. Initially, the British suffered several defeats, most notably the massacre of General Braddock’s force at the Battle of Monongahela. Indians who were not already allies of the French were encouraged by these early French victories and joined with the French against British settlements. A series of deadly Indian raids soon followed the entire length of British western settlements.
In 1754, Massachusetts governor William Shirley appointed John Winslow as major-general of the colonial militia. In 1756, General Winslow turned to the 25-year-old Robert Rogers to raise and command soldiers for service to the British Crown. Recruitment wasn’t difficult because frontier citizens were badly frightened (not to mention angry) by the sudden increase in Indian depredations.
Rogers raised an irregular (militia) company of rangers, one of several New England ranger companies with a tradition dating back to the 1670s. The model for Roger’s ranging company was Gorham’s Rangers, initially formed in 1744. During the French and Indian War, Gorham’s Rangers was a contemporary company raised by Robert Rogers. Among Robert’s early recruits were his younger brothers James, Richard, and John.
Roger’s Ranger Company was an independent provisional force trained, equipped, paid, and commanded by Captain Rogers. The mission of this rapidly deployable light infantry unit was reconnaissance and such special operations as conducting winter and night raids on French towns and military encampments. The company operated primarily in the area of Lake George and Lake Champlain (New York). It was particularly adept at moving rapidly but quietly over rugged mountain terrain and rain-swollen rivers. Rogers’ ranging tactics proved so effective that the ranging company was eventually expanded into a corps of more than a dozen companies (around 1,400 men), which became the chief scouting arm of British land forces in North America.
The usefulness of Rogers’ company during 1756 and 1757 prompted the British to form a second ranger company in 1758. Eventually, the fourteen companies of rangers would include three all-Indian units (two of Stockbridge Mahicans and one of Mohegan and Pequot composition). Governor Shirly promoted Robert Rogers to Major and placed him in command of the Ranger Corps.
There were no Queensbury Rules of fighting a guerilla war during the French and Indian War. As good as Rogers’ Rangers were, they didn’t always win the day. In January 1757, Rogers led a 74-man company in an ambuscade near Fort Carillon (near the narrows along the southern region of Lake Champlain). After capturing seven prisoners, a force of around 120 French regulars, militia, and allied Indians attacked Rogers. The strength of the attack forced Rogers to withdraw. The French killed fourteen of Rogers’ men, took six as prisoners, and wounded six others. It was only through his use of snowshoes that Rogers and his men escaped without further casualties.
Later that year, a company of rangers was stationed at Fort William Henry when the French placed the fort under siege. When the British commander realized that his fight was over and surrendered, the French massacred every British regular and militia soldier, including Noah Johnson’s Ranger Company of sixty men.
In March 1758, another company of rangers attacked a French and Indian column, but once again, the rangers took heavy casualties, losing 125 soldiers killed, eight wounded, and 52 surviving through rapid withdrawal.
In May, four companies of rangers (around 500 men) went ashore at Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, during the siege of Louisbourg. Three companies of Rogers’ Rangers and one company of Gorham’s Rangers. While conducting search and destroy operations, the rangers encountered over a hundred French and Mi’kmaq warriors. In the ensuing fight, Rangers killed fifty and took 70 more captives.
In July, Rogers’ Rangers took part in the Battle of Carillon. Some two-hundred French Canadians and three-hundred Indians attacked a British convoy, killing 116 and capturing 60 men. A month later, at Crown Point, a French force of 450 men attacked a smaller force of British light infantry and provincials. Ranger Captain Israel Putnam was one of the men captured. The British lost 49 killed in this battle but claimed 100 or more dead French and Indian allies. Putnam was later saved from burning at the stake by the intervention of a French officer.
The St. Francis Raid of 1759 was one of the more infamous engagements of the rangers. In retribution for what General Amherst thought of as Abenaki treachery, he sent Rogers to destroy the Indian settlement at St. Francis, near the southern shore of the St. Lawrence River outside Quebec. Major Rogers led a force of 140 men from Crown Point deep into French territory. The raid was successful, which, according to Rogers, meant that he and his Rangers slaughtered 200 women, children, and elderly people. News of the attack reached Trois-Rivières around noon that day. Captain Jean-Daniel Dumas organized a force of experienced fighters to pursue Rogers.
The Rangers, burdened by the weight of their supplies and the inconvenience of marching prisoners, made good progress, covering the 70 miles to Lake Memphremagog in about eight days, but at this point, their rations began to run out. The wearied condition of his men and dwindling food stores forced Rogers to divide his men up into smaller units, which he sent out independently with orders to proceed to the abandoned Fort Wentworth. Rogers suffered 21 of his men killed, six wounded, and five missing in action (later determined captured) during this operation. But as to the number of casualties on both sides, British and French reports reveal significant discrepancies of the same incident.
In the spring of 1760, the Rogers’ Rangers joined the Montreal campaign under General Jeffrey Amherst, which included a raid on Fort Saint Therese, a French supply hub between Fort Saint-Jean and Ile Aux Noix. After destroying the fort, the French and Indians assaulted the Rangers during their withdrawal but inflicted only minor casualties.
Afterward, Amherst ordered the Rangers to support the column of Brigadier General William Haviland. General Haviland dispatched Rogers’ four ranger companies (augmented by a detachment of light infantry and Indian allies) with three cannons through the forest and swamps to take up a firing position to the rear of the French position. It was a difficult task, taking several days, but Rogers did manage to set the artillery along a riverbank facing the French naval force.
Rogers’ order to fire completely surprised the French navy and caused some panic among them to move their ships out of harm’s way. When one sloop cut her cable, wind and current carried her to shore and fell into the hands of the British. The other ships managed to escape but went aground in a bend in the river, and these too were eventually captured by Rangers, who swam out to board the vessels.
With their line of communications severed, the French had little choice but to evacuate the island. General Amherst moved quickly to capitalize on his successes by forcing a French withdrawal to Montreal, which surrendered without a fight in the following month.
After the French and Indian War
After the fall of Montreal, General Amherst assigned Rogers to Brigadier Robert Monckton, who ordered Rogers to capture Fort Detroit. Once accomplished, there being no further need of Rangers, Amherst disbanded them and sent them home. Following their standard practices of the day, the British retired Robert Rogers at half-pay.
Rogers’ income proved dire because the British did not reimburse him for the money he had spent out of his pocket paying and equipping his men, which rendered Rogers destitute. He traveled to London, where, in an attempt to produce an income, he authored a book about his adventures and helped develop a stage play about Pontiac’s War. Both the book and play were successful enough to earn him an audience with King George III. The King rewarded Rogers for his service by appointing him as Governor of Mackinaw, a minor posting.
In America, General Thomas Gage replaced Amherst as Commander-in-Chief. Unfortunately, Gage detested Rogers, and from every account, the feeling was mutual. In 1767, General Gage charged Rogers with treason for having established a “too comfortable” relationship with French Canadians. Having arrested Rogers, Gage ordered that he be taken to Detroit in chains to answer the charge. General Gage’s evidence was insufficient to stand up in court, but despite his acquittal in 1768, Gage ordered Rogers deported to England. To meet Rogers on the dock were London officials who promptly escorted him to debtor’s prison where he languished for three years.
In 1775, with a war on the horizon between Britain and the American colonies, the disenchanted Rogers returned to America and offered his services to the American military commander, George Washington. Washington, however, suspected Rogers as a British spy and ordered his arrest. However, the clever Rogers escaped and promptly offered his services once more to the Crown.
Based on Rogers’ previous success, the British commissioned him to command the Queen’s Rangers as regimental colonel. As General Gage previously stated on more than one occasion, Colonel Rogers was no gentleman — a fact that Rogers seemed to prove when he appointed, as officers of the Queen’s Regiment, owners of taverns and brothels.
Worse than that, however, beyond the arrest of Nathan Hale (a somewhat naive young captain who was ill-suited for espionage), the Queen’s Rangers had no successes in battle. In late October 1776, while General Washington withdrew his army toward White Plains, New York, General William Howe landed troops in Westchester intending to cut off Washington’s escape.
General Howe ordered Rogers to cover his eastern flank by seizing the village of Mamaroneck. During the night of 22 October, patriot Colonel John Haslet attacked the Queen’s Rangers, achieving complete surprise and inflicting many casualties before withdrawing. Even though the Rangers quickly recovered and attempted to pursue Haslet, General Howe sacked Colonel Rogers (and his officers) and appointed someone more “appropriate” to command the regiment. Howe may have cited Rogers’ poor health as justification for his relief, but the fact is that Rogers was an alcoholic, and he soon after returned to London.
Rogers returned to America in 1779, again obtained a commission to command the King’s Rangers, but that appointment lasted only a few months before he was again sacked for drunken behavior. Rogers returned to London, England, in 1780, where he remained until he died in 1793. He was 63 years of age.
Robert Rogers was not the only military commander to succumb to alcoholism. Famed patriot George Rogers Clark (the elder brother of William Rogers Clark) also died in the generally held disgraceful condition of alcoholism and self-pity, albeit several years later.
Robert Rogers did not invent unconventional warfare, nor even “ranging,” but he did display an affinity for special operations or “thinking outside the box.” Benjamin Church of Massachusetts was the first to establish “ranging” units of frontiersmen and friendly Indians in 1675. Those men would “range” between outposts looking for the sign of hostile Indians and French troublemakers. Church’s memoirs, published in 1716, became the first de facto American military manual — and there were several ranging units in existence long before Rogers’ Rangers.
But British ranging units never gained the respect of the regular forces, particularly from among the British Army’s aristocratic leaders. The stigma of commanding unconventional forces also attached itself to Colonel Sir Banastre Tarleton, and some degree to Colonel John Graves Simcoe, a fact carried forward in time to the Civil War when both Union and Confederate generals regarded partisan rangers as bushwhackers and murderers (which, in some cases, they were).
Still, the accomplishments of ranging units speak for themselves. The Rangers were one of a few non-native forces able to operate in the inhospitable backcountry under harsh winter conditions and rugged mountain terrain. By every account, the young Robert Rogers was an exceptional leader who mustered, paid, equipped, trained, and commanded his men. His Twenty-eight Rules for Ranging and Roger’s Standing Orders form part of the U.S. Army’s introduction to training materials on ranging. It wasn’t until much later in his life that Robert Rogers lost his glory and his honor.
- Cuneo, J. R. Robert Rogers of the Rangers. Oxford University Press, 1959.
- Fryer, M. B., and Christopher Dracott. John Graves Simcoe (1752-1806): A Biography. Dundurn Press, 1998.
- Ross, J. F. War on the run: the epic story of Robert Rogers and the conquest of America’s first frontier. Bantam Books, 2009.
- Scotti, A. J. Brutal Virtue: The Myth and Reality of Banastre Tarleton. Heritage Books, 2002.
- Sheftick, G. Rangers Among First Leaders of America’s Army. U.S. Army Historical Center, 2016.
- Zaboly, G. S. True Ranger: The Life and Many Wars of Major Robert Rogers. Royal Blockhouse, 2004.
 See also: Citizen Soldier and the American Militia.
 The name the Iroquois Confederacy gave to Major Washington was “Conotocaurius,” which we are told means the destroyer or devourer of villages.
 In British America, the colonel of the regiment was a secondary assignment of the colonial governor. Since most colonial governors never left their homes in England, the lieutenant governor served as de facto governor and also as lieutenant colonel of the colonial militia. Dinwiddie served as lieutenant governor under Governor Willem van Keppel (1751-1756) and was reappointed under Governor John Campbell (1756-1758). Subsequent to the Battle of Jumonville, Dinwiddie appointed Lieutenant Colonel Washington to command the Virginia Regiment.
 John Winslow was the grandson and great-grandson of two Massachusetts governors, the first of which, Edward, was born and raised in Droitwich, England, seven miles from the town of Worcester, where my wife was born.
 While on his recruitment drive in Portsmouth, Robert met his future wife, Elizabeth Browne, the daughter of a local minister.
 In 1744, John Gorham raised an auxiliary unit of mixed native American rangers led by Anglo officers for participation in King George’s War. Gorham was originally charged to reinforce regular British troops under siege at Fort Anne and was later employed in establishing British control over Nova Scotia fighting against Acadian and Mi’kmaq Indians.
 Richard died of smallpox in 1757 at Fort William Henry. Later, Indian enemies disinterred his body and, in retribution, mutilated it. Whether these Indians came down with Richard’s disease is unknown, but if they did, they probably spread it around the tribe.
 Fort Carillon was later named Fort Ticonderoga.
 Native American tribes frequently used ghastly torture techniques to torment their captives, the specific technique dependent upon the folkways of a particular tribe and perhaps on the circumstances of the conflict and capture. Burning captives at the stake was common among northeastern tribes.
 The French insisted that Rogers “only murdered” 30 innocents.
12 thoughts on “Roger’s Lost Glory”
You just gave an excellent history lesson. Thank you, sir. Now to your chagrin I may ask a very stupid question 1) out of ignorance, or 2) out of completely misunderstanding. Please be kind and indulge me.
The “Rangers” you speak of within the above text are the same as the “Rangers” we read about during the 1800’s here and in Canada? Also, is this where the “Rangers” in Texas stem from today?
LikeLiked by 1 person
The term “rangers” actually originated in the British colonies in the late 1600s. They were military units that “ranged” beyond the settlements to defend (in many cases through preemption) against the hostile intent of enemies (whether Indian or French). The term was later incorporated by the patriot forces during the Revolutionary War, and as you noted, in Texas (Texas Rangers). Since the original rangers were British army or militia, yes they did also operate in Canada. Today, the U.S. Army maintains a ranger force … one of the best in the world.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow so my question(s) were related. Thank God I thought I was way off, but I was not. Thanks so much for answering this question. I did not k ow the U.S. Army still maintained a ranger force. When I asked my husband a former Army Vet he laughed and said I should have known that. He is right but my forte is U.S. Law, Constitutional Law and SCOTUS. Having said this I am admitting I am not as up on all parts of history as I should be so thanks Mustang. You are a good teacher!
LikeLiked by 1 person
And yes I know, that was two questions. I hope not too dumb…
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are no dumb questions, Layla.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hey Mustang, there is no dumb question but can you answer mine please, lol!
Okay, that will be two cents, please. I take checks. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
What? No mention of the quaint old custom of scalp taking and paying Indians a bounty for the scalps of settlers -and “unfriendly” Indians- ? -spoiler; the Indians already knew how but both the French and English paid bounties.
I have no idea how they could tell where the scalps came from and I’m sure the Indians weren’t too picky. Ain’t no use wasting that mop of hair on granny’s head!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think I mentioned in an earlier post (The Puritan and Pequot War) that the Connecticut and Massachusetts colonies “paid for scalps” as early as the 1630s. I was actually hoping that you could tell us one of your stories from back when you served with Rogers.
Note: AC put me up to writing that.
That’s still classified information. My DD214 says I was never there. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great piece. Thanks. On the Netflix series, “Turn,” Robert Rogers is presented as a bit of a scoundrel. So, I looked him up somewhere and saw there was some truth to that. Your piece explains Robert Rogers even better. Yes, even in today’s Army, we talk about Roger’s 28 rules often. IIRC, his rules are a standard handout somehwre, maybe at the Infantry School at Ft. Benning.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Sir. Glad you enjoyed it.
Comments are closed.