Wake Island is so small, it was probably one of those statistical anomalies that Alvaro de Mendana ever found it in 1586. As was the custom back then, Mendana claimed the island for Spain, and may have even planted a flag —but since no one lived on the island, it was probably a ho-hum moment. I imagine the ship’s crew was disappointed, too. Then, in 1796, England’s Samuel Wake, of the merchantman William Henry, stumbled upon the atoll and named it after himself. Again, owing to the absence of humankind, no one’s feelings were hurt. Then on 20 December 1840, USS Vincennes brought the explorer Charles Wilkes and the naturalist Titian Peale to the atoll where they conducted a series of surveys and lent their names to the other two islands of the atoll (now consisting of Wake, Wilkes, and Peale).
Wake Island (a US unorganized territory) (something it has in common with Washington, D. C.) is one of the most isolated places in the world. Discounting Air Force/Space Force personnel stationed at Wake Island, the nearest human population to Wake Island is in the Marshall Islands, 592 miles away.
During the Spanish-American War in 1898, an American troop ship bound for the Philippines stopped at Wake, and because Major General Francis V. Greene regarded Wake Island as a war trophy, hoisted the Stars and Stripes over the island and proclaimed it a territory of the United States. At the Treaty of Paris (ended the Spanish-American War) Spain relinquished all claims of sovereignty over Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guam, all islands in the West Indies, and all islands within approximately 116 degrees of latitude and 127 degrees longitude east near and including the Philippine archipelago.
The treaty was amended at the Treaty of Washington three years later adding several additional islands located southwest of the island chain of Palawan that had been omitted from the original treaty; no other specific islands or locations of any kind were included —and since Wake Island did not fall within the boundaries of either treaty, it technically remains within the auspices of the Spanish crown. Nevertheless, possession being nine-tenths of the law, the United States retains possession of the Wake Island atoll.
Commercial shipping after 1850 became increasingly dependent on coal-fired ships. Twenty years later sailing ships were becoming a thing of the past. The consequences of coal-fired ships is quite extraordinary. There would be no commercial advantage to coal-fired ships if there were no dependable coaling stations at strategic locations throughout the world. Without coaling stations in the Pacific Rim, the United States would not have been able to compete with other western nations for a share of Asian trade. The economic advantages of coaling stations thus becomes self-evident.
The actual location of these coaling stations (no doubt in consultation with the US government) was a decision left in the hands of the shipping companies, and this too makes perfect sense. Shipping companies, after all, determine their own shipping routes, in turn governed by trade relationships. Commercial interests could lease land for coaling stations, but they could not guarantee the security of the stations, coal, employees, or ships. Only governments can do that … through treaties enforced by navies, of course. It was this situation that led the United States to its interests in the Pacific Rim.
Over time, an international naval presence prompted occasional uprisings by local natives, some of which were provoked by competing nations (Germany, for example). In any case, coaling stations morphed into advanced base structures. Protecting America’s advanced bases became a focus of the U. S. Navy and Marine Corps. Marine security forces (initially as Marine Barracks) eventually evolved into Marine Defense Battalions of the Fleet Marine Forces, which included coastal artillery.
Modern academics, particularly those in liberal colleges and universities, tell us that American Imperialism is a shameful thing because it involves policies aimed at extending political, economic, and cultural influence over areas beyond its boundaries. The argument is simplistic. Every nation seeks to influence areas beyond their borders and do so in a myriad of ways: military conquest, gunboat diplomacy, negotiating treaties most favorable to themselves, economic penetration, and intervention when necessary to protect their interests and investments. No matter what the academics say, imperialism is not a uniquely American idea. Global trade is the fuel of the world economy and has been for several hundred years and it is natural to seek trade relationships favorable to one’s own country. In defense of America’s global trade policies (going back in time, of course), European and Asian nations were happy to parcel up large sections of China for their own purposes; the United States was alone in arguing for an “Open Door” approach, which recognized Chinese sovereignty and sought to protect its administrative integrity. Protecting US advanced bases wasn’t so much an example of imperialism as it was common sense.
In the 1930s, the development of aircraft capable of flying across the Pacific Ocean produced a similar set of circumstances for the United States. Lacking the ability to fly non-stop across the Pacific Ocean, commercial aircraft companies considered mid-Pacific coaling stations as one solution to their refueling problem, and it made sense that these (mostly) island locations could also provide mechanical repair services and offer some respite to passengers and crew.
Japanese Interests in the Pacific
Anyone who can argue with a straight face that the Japanese mounted a sneak attack against the United States at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii is simply unaware of the history of America’s advanced bases in the Pacific. Let’s look at it.
During the First World War (1914-18), Japan participated as an ally of the Entente Powers and played an important role in securing the sea lanes in the Western Pacific and Indian Oceans from Imperial Germany’s naval domination. Taking advantage of Germany’s preoccupation with the European war, Japan seized German possessions in the Pacific and in East Asia. Japan accomplished this without a large-scale mobilization of its military and naval forces (this would occur later, in the 1920s). The story of Japanese preeminence in the Pacific is a long one, and somewhat complicated, but it is enough to note here that Japan used World War I as a springboard for expanding its sphere of influence throughout the Pacific, in China, and in Southeast Asia.
In the early 1920s, particularly after observing the comportment of Japanese diplomats at the Washington and London Naval Conferences, American strategists correctly predicted Japanese behavior over the next two decades. From 1933-40, Japan became a threat to the peace and stability of the entire Pacific rim. America’s isolated advanced base structure was jeopardized by Japanese militarism.
In January 1941, the United States began construction of submarine and aviation facilities on Wake Island, which lies some 2,400 miles west of Honolulu, Hawaii. Designated U. S. Naval Activity Wake, the atoll became an American outpost from which Navy and Marine Corps aircraft could patrol the likely approaches to the US territory of Hawaii. Ultimately, as history teaches us, Wake Island protected nothing at all. The Pacific Ocean is vast. Wake Island is very small. Navy and Marine Corps aircraft were limited in their fuel range.
Summary of the Battle
Japan’s Pearl Harbor attack and the Battle for Wake Island were simultaneous operations. For Hawaii, the battle was over in a few hours. At Wake Island, the battle raged for sixteen days. At 0800 on 7 December 1941, the Marines raised the American flag over Wake Island. It is something Marines do every morning. Fifty minutes later, 36 Japanese bombers on their way to Pearl Harbor pummeled the Island’s facilities.
The Japanese returned to Wake in force on 11 December 1941, meeting for the first time the spirited resolve of the American people and their military. The battle, when joined, involved 499 Marines of the 1st Defense Battalion and VMF-211 Detachment (12 pilots, 38 enlisted mechanics), 71 sailors of the Naval Activity Wake, and 6 soldiers. The island also contained 1,146 civilian construction workers. In terms of armaments, the Marines manned six coastal artillery pieces, 12 anti-aircraft guns, and 12 fighter/bomber aircraft. Over the next 16 days, the Marines lost all of their aircraft in aerial combat, suffered 52 killed, 49 wounded, and 2 men missing in action. Of the total contingent of military personnel, 433 became prisoners of war. In addition to these military losses, 70 civilian workers were killed, and 1,104 were detained as prisoners of the Japanese. 180 civilians died while in captivity.
The Japanese invading force included two aircraft carriers, two heavy cruisers, three light cruisers, eight destroyers, two patrol boats, two troop ships, one submarine tender, three submarines, and 2,500 Japanese infantry troops. Japanese losses included two destroyers sunk, two patrol boats sunk, heavy damage to two troop ships, the loss of 30 aircraft, 484 troops killed in action, 125 wounded in action, and 2 missing in action. Japan’s first invasion attempt had failed.
For the first few days, it seemed as if the Marines might successfully defend the island against the Japanese, but the Americans at Wake suffered Japan’s relentless aerial bombings and strafing. An American naval relief force from Hawaii was considered, but after the devastating losses at Pearl Harbor, US high command finally decided that the Marines and sailors at Naval Activity Wake were on their own. The US could simply not afford the loss of another capital war ship, and certainly not one of its few aircraft carriers.
When the second Japanese landing force arrived on 23 December, it overwhelmed Wake Island defenders. The Marines kept up their stout defense for five hours, but the Naval Activity Commander, Commander Winfield Scott Cunningham, decided that it would be prudent to surrender all hands. In total, 1,616 Americans were taken prisoner and transported to Japan and China. The Japanese retained nearly a hundred civilians on the island to perform labor. On 5 October 1943, the Japanese marched these men to one side of the island and executed them with machine gun fire. One civilian escaped and carved a memorial to his into a large rock, which read, “98 US PW 5-10-43.” The message remains today. Unfortunately, this escaped civilian was later recaptured and executed.
(Continued next week)
 From the French word for friendship, understanding, or agreement, this was an alliance between the Russian Empire, the French Third Republic, and Great Britain; it formed a counterweight to the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy during the same conflict. Unlike the Triple Alliance, the Triple Entente did not provide an alliance of mutual defense.
9 thoughts on “Alamo of the Pacific, Part I”
It always surprises me how little beyond Pearl Harbor we ever covered in school–I don’t think that Wake or Midway or the Philippines got more than a mention. Looking forward to the next installment.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You may be interested in a few of my previous articles, particularly about the “China Marines.” These tell the story of how the 4th Marines ended up in the Philippines and the events leading up to the Bataan March. Thank you for your interest, Miss Clare.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would be! Thanks for pointing me toward them.
Well, I graduated HS in 1970 and I’m amazed I even learned anything about America’s Civil War
LikeLiked by 2 people
I made a pitch to my school board years ago, a suggestion about how to teach world history. The basic argument was that too much has happened since the beginning of history (that is, the accumulation of written records) to present it in a meaningful way to classroom students who are only present in class because the law requires it. What happens year-in/year-out is that teachers open the textbook in ancient Mesopotamia and work forward in time through a series of rushes. Remember, there are only about 195 school days in a school year. Some teachers give up six or seven weeks to Rome, and by the end of the year, are struggling to get through the First World War. Few ever get to World War II. By then, everyone hates the class and can’t wait to bolt with their end of the year report card. Naturally, everyone passes the course, particularly if they play on the football team.
My idea was to present world history in reverse. The fact is that more human events have occurred in human history since the beginning of the Twentieth Century than in all the years before. The question was (is), what do we want students to know about their world? I would think that we would want them to know more about the events that affect them most; historical events that impacted their parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents. Plus, teaching in reverse allows students to see and understand events as effects of earlier events. Of course, this notion only pertains if we want students to understand history, rather than memorizing it. If, in teaching history in reverse we are only able to get back to the Industrial Age, if we never speak of Rome, so what? Secondary classes are “survey” courses. If a student one day chooses to focus their attention on Roman Civilization or Classic literature, they will do that in college or at university, not at Anytown High School.
Alas, it was another (of many) of my good ideas tossed on the trash heap of the American public education system. I didn’t learn the truth about public education until I went to work in publishing. There is very little we do inside the classroom that has anything at all to do with learning. It has everything to do with convincing taxpayers that their kids are being educated. Well, they aren’t. Don’t take my word for it. Instead, ask any employer whose business income relies on American-educated workers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
History in reverse is a great idea.
Standing by for pt II. I served at MB Yorktown, VA with a SgtMaj who had a “W” on his American Defense Medal. Spent WW II as POW in a coal mine in Manchuria.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’ll find Part II highly educational and worthy of your time.
Yes, looking forward to Part II
Comments are closed.